← Secure Open SolutionsCYBERSECURITY BRIEFINGExplore the SOS service guide →

SOS CYBERSECURITY BRIEFING

Know what changed.
Understand what to do next.

Short updates on CMMC, C3PAO, DFARS and protecting CUI. Read the context, consider the impact, and explore a useful next step—right here.

Dated source briefings · Publication dates are shown on each item.

NIST / CUI · Published 2026-09-16

NIST adds a small-business guide to assessment planning

NIST published SP 1352 to introduce small businesses to assessment concepts and preparation under SP 800-171A Revision 3. The primer is aimed at people managing implementation or preparing for an assessment.

Read the briefing

Why it matters

A practical introduction can help business owners organize an assessment workstream. This publication concerns Revision 3; it does not by itself establish which revision or assessment applies to your contract.

Suggested next step

Identify the revision named in your requirements, then organize the boundary, responsibilities and evidence your assessment will examine.

Source & publication context

NIST CSRC · Small Business Primer for SP 800-171A, Revision 3

Published 2026-09-16 · Source checked (Eastern) 2026-10-26

Source excerpt: “basic strategies for planning for an assessment”

Source-researched editorial summary. A dated source report is not a determination of current contract obligations.

Explore secure enclaves →

C3PAO · Published 2026-07-15

Assessment availability and rollout requirements are different questions

In its July statement about the announced Phase II suspension, The Cyber AB said C3PAO Level 2 assessments and other ecosystem services remained available. This is a dated program update, not a claim about today’s contract requirements.

Read the briefing

Why it matters

A change to a rollout milestone does not answer every question about a prime contractor’s expectations, an existing clause, or assessment planning. Separate the source announcement from the requirements in your actual procurement.

Suggested next step

Confirm the latest direction and your contract language before changing an assessment schedule or readiness plan.

Source & publication context

The Cyber AB · Statement on the suspension of CMMC Phase II requirements

Published 2026-07-15 · Source checked (Eastern) 2026-10-26

Source excerpt: “all CMMC program elements remain operational and available”

Source-researched editorial summary. A dated source report is not a determination of current contract obligations.

Explore C3PAO services →

NIST / CUI · Published 2026-05-13

NIST updates enhanced CUI safeguards and assessment procedures

NIST released revised enhanced CUI protection requirements and assessment procedures, covering areas such as access controls, segmentation and supply-chain security. The paired documents align their structure with Revision 3 of SP 800-171.

Read the briefing

Why it matters

The publications can inform security architecture and higher-risk CUI planning. Their publication alone does not establish a new requirement for every contractor or automatically change an assessment baseline.

Suggested next step

Compare the publication’s purpose with your system scope and applicable requirements before proposing changes.

Source & publication context

NIST CSRC · NIST releases SP 800-172r3 and SP 800-172Ar3

Published 2026-05-13 · Source checked (Eastern) 2026-10-26

Source excerpt: “Expanded security requirements that address access controls”

Source-researched editorial summary. A dated source report is not a determination of current contract obligations.

Explore secure enclaves →

DFARS · Publication date not supplied

Start with the clause in your actual contract

DFARS coverage, assessment planning and evidence expectations need to be read in the context of the actual solicitation or contract. Use a short clause-and-boundary review to turn a broad cybersecurity question into a specific work plan.

Read the briefing

Why it matters

A news item is useful context, but it cannot determine which obligations apply to your organization. Keeping the contract, system boundary and supporting evidence together makes the next conversation more productive.

Suggested next step

Use the SOS assessment guide, then bring the relevant clause and system scope to a focused discussion.

Source & publication context

SOS editorial explainer · Contract-specific DFARS assessment planning

Publication date not supplied · Source checked (Eastern) 2026-10-26

SOS editorial explainer. A dated source report is not a determination of current contract obligations.

Read the SOS DFARS guide →

Source-attributed summaries and suggested actions. AI-assisted items are labeled. Confirm applicability against your contract and current official direction.